People development

Training needs analysis, from a task gap to an action

Begin with a task people need to perform and compare the expected steps with what happens in practice. Ask whether people know what to do, have what they need and have a chance to apply it. The answer tells you whether training, a change to the work or both will help.

Name the task, expectation and observation

Write the question in operational terms. “New hires need better training” is a request. “By their third supervised shift, can new hires find the correct procedure and escalate an exception to the shift lead?” can be checked. Agree the expected behavior and where it applies with an owner who understands the work.

Record when the observed problem occurred, who could see it and what evidence is available. Use a small mix of accounts and a permitted observation or record. Compare people doing similar work under similar conditions. Make differences in access, shift coverage and workflow visible.

A worked example from a new-hire cohort

In a fictional facilities operation, some new hires take longer than expected to classify a service request. A supervisor watches three practice requests. One hire chooses the right route when given the procedure and cannot find the current version from their account. Another opens it easily and misreads a common exception. A third can explain the rule, but the required approver is unavailable on the evening shift.

Give the first hire a reliable route to the current instructions and test whether they can find it. Give the second a brief guided exercise with two borderline cases and feedback. Ask the operations owner to fix the evening approval route for the third. Each response has a different owner and a different success check. A single training course would leave two of the three barriers in place.

Test the cause before prescribing the intervention

Ask someone to explain how they would do the task, then observe an attempt with the tools and time they normally have. If they can do it when a barrier is removed, record the barrier. If they cannot recognize the correct action under workable conditions, design practice around the decision they miss.

Look for more than one cause. A poor reference and an ambiguous exception can coexist. Record which cause is supported, which remains a hypothesis and what would change your interpretation. Work with affected employees when the intervention changes how the job is done.

Review performance at the task

Make the success check match the intervention. For access, can the employee open the current reference independently? For learning, can they explain and handle a new example? For a workflow change, is someone available to decide during the relevant shift? Count eligible attempts when you record outcomes and note where the follow-up conditions differ.

At the review, decide whether to keep the intervention, change it or investigate further. CIPD’s learning needs analysis guidance ties learning to performance gaps. CDC’s training standards likewise start by assessing whether training addresses the need. Use the worksheet to keep the diagnosis, decision and follow-up together.

Frequently asked questions

Questions that come up

What goes into a training needs analysis template?

Include the task, expected behavior, observed gap, evidence, likely cause, proposed response, owner and how the result will be tested.

How is a skills gap analysis different?

A skills gap analysis compares current and required capabilities. A training needs analysis uses that evidence and checks work conditions to decide which gaps training can address.

Talk to Lontra HR

Bring one real HR question.

See how a first campaign could work for your team.

Book a demo