Frontline operations
How to improve knowledge transfer at shift handover.
The outgoing and incoming teams often have different views of the same handover. Compare one recent event, locate the point at which useful context was lost and give the people on shift a way to test a change.
- Two perspectives
- Ask the sender what they intended to transfer and the receiver what they could act on.
- Testable change
- Make open work, the next owner and the next check visible in the approved process.
- Safety-critical work
- Use the established procedure, qualified reviewers and formal change controls for safety-critical handovers.
Choose one handover event
Pick a defined shift change and ask both teams to reconstruct it from their own perspective. What work was open? Which decisions had already been made? What was recorded, communicated verbally or left to the next shift to find? Note when a fact became visible to each team.
For a fictional example, a warehouse outbound team leaves an exception open on one order. The outgoing lead says they recorded “waiting for check.” The incoming lead sees that a check is needed and has no owner or due time. Ask what would help the receiving team act on the update.
Compare what was sent with what was understood
Write a simple handover timeline. Include the open task, who was expected to act, the information the next person needed and when they first had enough to act. Ask the receiver to explain the next step from what they had at the time. Ask the sender what made that responsibility seem clear.
Look for a good handover in the same setting. What made the next owner, time or dependency obvious? The contrast can reveal a field, habit or opportunity to ask a question that the weak handover lacked. Use permitted records or a synthetic reconstruction if the case involves restricted information.
Test a clearer handover for a routine task
For ordinary work, try a short handover structure using current state, outstanding action, owner and next check. Ask the incoming colleague to state the next action back. Have a process owner check that this aligns with approved local practice before using it.
Review a few comparable shifts. Track where the incoming team needed to ask again for information that was meant to be transferred. Check whether the proposed change introduces avoidable work or makes it easier to overlook another important condition. If an issue involves a safety-critical process, use the formal route for changes and follow the established incident reporting process.
Record the change where people work
Document the approved change in the official handover material and identify the person who owns it. Share one example of what a usable entry looks like. Give incoming and outgoing colleagues the opportunity to question what is practical during their shift.
The UK Health and Safety Executive’s shift handover guidance discusses preparation, communication between shifts and cross-checking, with both verbal and written communication in its good practice recommendations. An after-action conversation can help discover where those steps need attention in your setting. Follow your local requirements for how the handover itself is conducted.
Frequently asked questions
Questions that come up
How can I improve a handover when shifts rarely overlap?
Find out when both teams can exchange information and check which questions cannot wait. Ask the process owner to review the approved communication route, overlap and any safety constraints before testing a change.
How do I know a handover is clearer?
Ask the receiver to identify the open work and next owner without extra help. Compare examples across a few similar shifts and record exceptions or unintended effects.
What if this reveals a safety problem?
Use the established safety and incident channels. Treat any proposed change to a safety-critical process as work for the appropriate owner under the applicable procedure.
Talk to Lontra HR
Bring one real HR question.
See how a first campaign could work for your team.